They ALL do it anyway!

Yup, that's the blanket excuse for both Progressives and Libertarians.

What am I getting at, you may ask?

I was astonished to learn from my friends that a Dem scandal had escaped my notice.

A pretty frikken huge one too, at that...

An anti-gun legislator, one Leland Yee, who had long lowed with the likes of Diane Feinstein and others about the EVULS of what they broadly defined as 'assault weapons' which in their peabrained reckoning means anything with a forward handhold or grip more often than not, found himself outed, his miserable secrets exposed.

The same night I found some of my convictions challenged. Yanno, what use is all this I do when forced far beyond my ability ebb and crash?

Legitimate point, but one I happen to respectfully disagree with. One life can mean all the difference.

Such as Mr. Yee, who plowed the way for not just REAL assault weapons, but also OVER THE SHOULDER ROCKER LAUNCHERS to come into the United States of America from radical Muslim sects.

That's frikken brilliant, isn't it?

I've talked about the corruption with many a Dem and to my disgust, many of them were of the mind that 'corruption is just the way things go. It's just a way of life for politicians. We should just let them do their thing until they get caught.' and so on and so forth. In other words, their stance is the same as their stance on passing out condoms in High School and prison (Pseudonyms as far as I'm concerned) because 'The kids and prisoners will have sex like bunnies one way or another, we might as well make it easy for them!'

It's the same mindset Libertarians have for narcotics. 'Lots of people smoke pot, meth, inject heroin or pop Ecstacy, so we might as well make it legal! Besides, alcohol is worse for you and it's legal!' Firstly, this is erroneous thinking based on professors and 'scientists' who are probably guilty of toking doobies themselves. Each of those has a medical problem. With marijuana, it has PERMANENT apathy-related mental issues and is no better for your lungs than cigarettes. With meth, just take a look at this and tell me it isn't bad for you. With heroin... apart from the addictive nature and how screwed up it makes your brain, how appealing does choking to death on your own vomit sound?  As far as Ecstacy is concerned, how does a lifetime of neurological damage sound? How about a heart attack at age 30? I hold that alcohol is as bad, but because its abuse is more DETECTABLE, it shall remain legal.

No, I say.

NO I goddamned well say.

No compromise with the wicked.

Hold their feet to the fire and get them to stop dirtying our government and poisoning our children.

**DISCLAIMER*

Since I know some people will take this the wrong way (Though if they get butthurt by the connection of wickedness with drugs, then what's that say about them? >_>) I would like to add that I mean the dealers of drugs. When it comes to the political corruption aspect though, anyone who gets their undies in a bunch over that one should have their right to vote suspended until they get a goddamned clue.